{"id":34915,"date":"2025-05-09T22:20:25","date_gmt":"2025-05-09T14:20:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/?p=34915"},"modified":"2025-05-09T22:20:25","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T14:20:25","slug":"%e6%9d%9c%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%a7%e5%ad%a6%e7%a0%94%e7%a9%b6%ef%bc%9a%e8%8b%a5%e5%9c%a8%e5%b7%a5%e4%bd%9c%e4%b8%ad%e4%bd%bf%e7%94%a8%e7%94%9f%e6%88%90%e5%bc%8f-ai%ef%bc%8c%e5%90%8c%e4%ba%8b%e5%8f%af","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/34915.html","title":{"rendered":"Duke study: coworkers may question your competence if you use generative AI at work"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>May 9, 2011 - According to a report today in the foreign media Neowin, the U.S.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/tag\/%e6%9d%9c%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%a7%e5%ad%a6\" title=\"[Sees articles with tags on Duke University]\" target=\"_blank\" >Duke University<\/a>The latest study points out that despite the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/tag\/ai\" title=\"[View articles tagged with [AI]]\" target=\"_blank\" >AI<\/a> Tools can increase productivity, but the use of tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini<strong>May make coworkers and managers think you are inadequate<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-34916\" title=\"aac62d04j00svzzsx001td000v900l2p\" src=\"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/aac62d04j00svzzsx001td000v900l2p.jpg\" alt=\"aac62d04j00svzzsx001td000v900l2p\" width=\"1125\" height=\"758\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The study, titled \"Using AI Tools Encounters a Social Evaluation Penalty,\" has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using four experiments involving more than 4,400 participants, the study found that people who use AI tools often experience negative judgments from coworkers and managers about their abilities and motivations.<\/p>\n<p>Duke University Fuqua School of Business researchers Jessica A. Reeve, Richard P. Larrick, and Jack B. Saul found that.<strong>Employees using AI tools are often perceived as not being competent enough, or even lazy and not trying hard enough<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In the first experiment, participants were required to envision themselves<strong>Whether to use AI tools or traditional dashboard creation tools<\/strong>to accomplish work tasks. The results showed that participants who chose the AI tool<strong>A general expectation that one will be perceived as lazy, incapable, and not hard enough working<\/strong>, and even easier to replace.<\/p>\n<p>Participants also stated<strong>Less willing to disclose to coworkers and managers that they are using AI tools<\/strong>.. A follow-up supplemental study validated this result, showing that participants using the AI tool received significantly lower competency scores than those using the traditional tool.<\/p>\n<p>The second experiment then<strong>Further validating these concerns<\/strong>.. When evaluating employee performance, employees who use AI tools always<strong>Evaluated as lazy, not capable enough, not independent enough and lacking self-confidence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Another study looked at the\u00a0<strong>Whether AI is common in the workplace and whether this factor would change the negative comments above<\/strong>.. It turns out that the prevalence of AI use does not significantly change these social ratings, showing that this negative rating is highly stable.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, this bias<strong>May also influence actual business decisions<\/strong>. In a recruitment simulation, the<strong>Managers who use AI infrequently are less likely to hire candidates who use it frequently<\/strong>The study also found that managers who used AI frequently were more likely to hire candidates who used AI. This phenomenon is also consistent with other findings in the study:<strong>Evaluators who are less likely to use AI tend to think that AI users are lazier<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The final experiment showed that<strong>Perceived laziness<\/strong>is the main reason for this negative evaluation, if AI tools<strong>Effective and appropriate for the given task<\/strong>, this penalty may be mitigated. The study notes that in certain manual tasks, the use of AI tools would be considered (human) incompetent, but in digital tasks, the use of AI is<strong>Seen as a positive factor in improving task suitability<\/strong>, helping to counteract the negative perception of laziness.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>May 9 news, according to foreign media Neowin reported today, the United States of America Duke University's latest study pointed out that although AI tools can improve the efficiency of the work, but the use of tools such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini may make colleagues and managers think that you are not enough ability. The study, titled \"Use of AI Tools Encounters a Social Evaluation Penalty,\" has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Using four experiments involving more than 4,400 participants, the study found that people who use AI tools often experience negative judgments from coworkers and managers about their abilities and motivation. Researchers Jessica A. Reeve, Richard P. Larrick, and Jack B. Saul of Duke University's Fuqua School of Business found that using AI workers<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[146],"tags":[411,6550],"collection":[],"class_list":["post-34915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-ai","tag-6550"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34915","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34915"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34915\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34915"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=34915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}