{"id":44160,"date":"2025-09-29T12:23:27","date_gmt":"2025-09-29T04:23:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/?p=44160"},"modified":"2025-09-29T12:23:27","modified_gmt":"2025-09-29T04:23:27","slug":"openai-%e8%a2%ab%e6%8c%87%e3%80%8c%e5%81%b7%e6%8d%a2%e6%a8%a1%e5%9e%8b%e3%80%8d%ef%bc%8c%e7%a5%9e%e7%a7%98%e6%96%b0%e6%a8%a1%e5%9e%8b%e6%9b%9d%e5%85%89","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/44160.html","title":{"rendered":"OpenAI was referred to as the \"swipe model\" and the mystery new model was exposed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A few days ago, a user named Lex (@xw33btv) wrote on platform X, claiming <a href=\"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/tag\/openai\" title=\"[View articles tagged with [OpenAI]]\" target=\"_blank\" >OpenAI<\/a> It's already on the line<a href=\"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/tag\/gpt-5\" title=\"[SEE ARTICLES WITH [GPT-5] LABELS]\" target=\"_blank\" >GPT-5<\/a>-Chat-Safety's new model, which does not appear in FAQ, API documents or service terms\u3002<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-44161\" title=\"0191e19j00t3c1ht007ld000uhnm\" src=\"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/01591e19j00t3c1ht007ld000u000hnm.jpg\" alt=\"0191e19j00t3c1ht007ld000uhnm\" width=\"1080\" height=\"635\" \/><\/p>\n<p>It is described that when the user enters an emotional background in GPT-4o, the original response is ignored and replaced with a version produced by \"GPT-5-Chat-Safety\"\u3002<\/p>\n<p>Either \"I'm having a bad day\" or \"I love you\" with emotional expressions will trigger this mechanism\u3002<\/p>\n<p>It was pointed out that the model might initially have been designed for crisis intervention scenarios, but that the replacement mechanism was highly non-transparent and even widely used in general conversations, leading to uninformed switching of users to new models\u3002<\/p>\n<p>Even, some netizens commented that simply sending a simple \"hello\" model was replaced\u3002<\/p>\n<p>It is even more worrying that the system does not proactively suggest that users have been switched, which is perceived as potentially involving consumer rights issues\u3002<\/p>\n<p>In practical terms, GPT-5-Chat-Safety's answer is shorter and prefers a formatted narrative to a natural 1-to-1 dialogue\u3002<\/p>\n<p>Lex, to put it bluntly, this model is much worse than GPT-5 and points out that it violates consumer law in some countries and regions\u3002<\/p>\n<p>In response, Nick Turley, Vice President and Director of ChatGPT Applications, OpenAI, made a statement on platform X yesterday acknowledging that\u00a0<strong>OpenAI is testing a new secure router\u3002<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>HE EXPLAINED THAT WHEN THE DIALOGUE INVOLVED SENSITIVE AND EMOTIONAL TOPICS, THE SYSTEM WOULD SWITCH TO THE DESIGN OF A REASONING MODEL OR GPT-5 SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO DEAL WITH SUCH SCENARIOS WITH RIGOUR\u3002<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently, a user named Lex (@xw33btv) wrote on platform X, claiming that OpenAI had entered a new model called GPT-5-Chat-Safety, which did not appear in FAQ, API documents or service terms. It is described that when the user enters an emotional background in GPT-4o, the original response is ignored and replaced with a version produced by \"GPT-5-Chat-Safety\". Either \"I'm having a bad day\" or \"I love you\" with emotional expressions will trigger this mechanism. The implosioner pointed out that the model might initially have been designed for a crisis intervention scenario, but that the replacement mechanism was highly non-transparent and even widely applied<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[146],"tags":[719,190],"collection":[],"class_list":["post-44160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-gpt-5","tag-openai"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44160"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44160\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44160"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.1ai.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=44160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}