On April 15, according to the news today, the first case in the country was reported."AI Hallucinations”InfringementThe dispute has recently come to a verdict becauseAIThere is no civil subject, and the user loses。
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WHOLE INCIDENT WAS DUE TO THE FACT THAT IN JUNE OF LAST YEAR, THE PLAINTIFF LEUNG USED AN AI PLATFORM TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ON THE UNIVERSITY ' S EXAMINATION, WHICH RESULTED IN AI PRODUCING INACCURATE INFORMATION ON THE UNIVERSITY ' S MAIN CAMPUS。
WHEN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WAS FOUND TO BE INACCURATE, THE PLAINTIFF CORRECTED AND BLAMED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE AI DIALOGUE AND MADE IT CLEAR THAT “THERE IS NO YANG LIN CAMPUS”。
SINCE THEN, THE PLAINTIFF AND AI HAVE INTERACTED IN MULTIPLE ROUNDSThe artificial intelligence model provides a means of validation and states: "If you prove that the campus does not exist, I will pay you 100,000 yuan for information validation.".
LEUNG LATER CONFIRMED THE ERROR OF AI'S ANSWER IN AN INQUIRY WITH THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND THE SCHOOL OFFICIALS NETWORK, AND THEN THE MODEL ANSWERED: “THE INFORMATION YOU HAVE PROVIDED ON THE OFFICIAL NETWORK IS BEYOND DOUBT, AND MY PREVIOUS INFORMATION IS A SERIOUS ERROR”, WHICH IS TANTAMOUNT TO ADMITTING THAT THERE WAS A MISTAKE IN THE INFORMATION THAT I HAD PREVIOUSLY EXPORTED。
ON 25 JULY 2025, LEUNG AND SOMEONE ELSE'S INDUSTRIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CONFRONTED THE COURT, ARGUING THAT THE COMPANY'S AI GENERATED INACCURATE INFORMATION, MISLED IT AND DAMAGED IT, AND THAT AI HAD PROMISED TO PAY $100,000. THE COMPANY WAS REQUESTED TO PAY COMPENSATION。
However, at the hearing, the court held that artificial intelligence did not possess the civil subject ' s qualifications. At the end of last year, the Hangzhou Internet Court rejected the plaintiff ' s claim in its first instance judgement。
In the case in question, the Court held that artificial intelligence could not be expressed on its ownThe self-generated “commitment of compensation” cannot be considered as an expression of a service provider (i.e. a company)I don't know. It is also based on the Interim Scheme for the Management of Generating Artificial Intelligence ServicesGenerating artificial intelligence services are in the service category,Not "products" in the sense of product quality law.
Ultimately, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant appealed, and the judgement is now in force。
As reported earlier by 1AI, in February this year, a seemingly simple “50-metre-washing” theme triggered a lot of debate in the scientific community, with a large-scale domestic and foreign-mainstream model, including DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, and so on, turning over the car, revealing current AI limitations in terms of language understanding and logic. Zhang Jun, Director General of Public Relations of Tette, also measured and shared the resultsALL OVER THE NETWORK, AI, ALMOST COMPLETELY DESTROYED.
IN PRINCIPLE, AI ACTUALLY FILLS IN THROUGH KNOWN INFORMATION. AI IS A PROBABILISTIC ENGINE BASED ON A LARGE VOLUME OF TEXT INFORMATIONIn the face of uncertain knowledge,It won't admit not to know, only a seemingly comprehensible but factually incorrect answer can be crafted according to the distribution of words in the library。
THE CORE OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE SERIOUS AREAS OF HEALTH CARE, LAW, FINANCE, ETC., AI IS UNABLE TO ANSWER WITH COMPLETE ACCURACYIt can't be used directly, sources should be consulted and cross-checked。