On May 7th, the news is that artificial intelligence technology is being integrated into content creationAI skitsTHE ADVANTAGES OF LOW-THRESHOLD, NEW FORMS, ETC. ARE FAST-TRACKED. ACCORDING TO THE NEWS TODAY, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE COUNTRY, THERE IS AN AI SHORT PLAYInfringementThe first sentence in the criminal case was handed down in over 1,700 cases, which constituted a violation of copyright。
IT IS ALLEGED THAT THE OPERATOR OF A NETWORK GAME HAS DEVELOPED A SPECIAL AI TOOL IN WHICH THE CREATORS ENTER THE INITIAL SCRIPT, SCENARIO SETTING, CAMERA REQUIREMENTS, ETC., TO PRODUCE THE AI SHORTS QUICKLY AND TO BE PUBLISHED ON AN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED PLATFORM FOR VIEWING BY USERS AT A FEE。
ACCORDING TO THE COMPANY ' S STAFF, HUNDREDS OF USERS HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN THE CREATION, WHICH HAD RESULTED IN THE CREATION OF MORE THAN 700 AI SHORT PLAYS, WITH A UNIT PRICE RANGING FROM SEVERAL TO A DOZEN DOLLARS, OF WHICH SEVERAL POPULAR SHORT PLAYS HAD BEEN SOLD TO THOUSANDS。
However, in the second half of 2024, the company ' s staff discovered that the short play had been publicly sold without permission. The link that was hanging on a second-hand platform showed that more than 1,300 short play works were sold for 66.66。The short plays were verified by the staff as having been obtained by means of poaching without any authorization.
IN THE LIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE, THE PROSECUTION CONSIDERS THAT THE AI SHORT PLAY IN THIS CASE IS NOT SIMPLY AN INPUT OF THE KEYWORD “GENERATED BY A SINGLE KEY”, BUT RATHER A USER THAT SETS THE SUBJECT, PERSON, PLOT, STYLE THROUGH THE ORIGINAL SCRIPTIt reflects the creator's personal conception and original expression, and meets the criteria for the identification of a work within the meaning of copyright law.
1AI LEARNED FROM REPORTS THAT ON APRIL 21, 2026, THE CASE WAS HEARD IN THE KNOWLEDGE TOWN COURT OF THE HUANG PO DISTRICT PEOPLE'S COURT OF GUANGZHOU CITY, WHERE THE DEFENDANT WAS CONVICTED OF VIOLATING COPYRIGHT AT FIRST INSTANCESentenced to eight months in prison, suspended for one year and two months, and fined 6,000 yuanI DON'T KNOW. THE JUDGE STATED THAT, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE EVIDENCE IN THE CASE, THE AI SHORT PLAY INVOLVED IN THE CASE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A WORK PROTECTED BY LAW。