JULY 14TH, THE DAY BEFORE, THE FOUNDER AND CEO OF INWEIDA Jen-Hsun HuangIn a conversation with Harrison Chase, the founder of Langchain, it was said that Al-Ai would not be able to do anything about it AgentIn essence, it remains a tool and should not be overhumanized. He claimed that such systems were “electronic, not atoms”, did not have biological attributes or consciousness and were closer to software systems capable of performing their tasks on their own。
HUANG IN-HOON COMPARES EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A GROUND SWEEPER, A DISHWASHER, AND BELIEVES THAT THE FUNCTIONS OF AI CAN BE DESCRIBED IN A COMPREHENSIBLE WAY, BUT THAT SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN A PLETHORA OF FEATURES。
HE SAID THAT DEVELOPERS COULD CONTINUOUSLY OPTIMIZE AI SYSTEMS THROUGH COMPONENTS SUCH AS MODELS, TOOLS, MEMORY SYSTEMS, SAFETY PROTECTION AND OPERATING ENVIRONMENTS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED AS AN UNDERSTANDABLE AND IMPROVED COMPUTING TOOL。
AT THE SAME TIME, HE SAID THAT THE SPREAD OF AI DID NOT NECESSARILY MEAN A REDUCTION IN THE TOTAL NUMBER OF JOBS. AS BUSINESSES DEPLOY MORE AI SMARTS, SOFTWARE ENGINEERS MAY SHIFT THEIR FOCUS FROM CODE-WRITING TO THE DESIGN OF SMARTS, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, THE DEVELOPMENT OF BENCHMARKS AND SECURITY BARS。
WONG IN-HOON STATED THAT AI ' S INTELLIGENCE BODY COULD UNDERTAKE SOME OF THE REPETITIVE TASKS, WHILE HUMANS STILL HAD TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SYSTEM DESIGN, FIELD JUDGEMENT AND CONTINUOUS OPTIMIZATION。