October 28th. MathematicianDunsonOn October 25, in a forum speech co-organized by Intellectuals, Mr. Sai, he saidAI rightMathematicsThere is much to promote, but the company that provides the model also needs to face academic norms, sources of thought and user interests。
IN HIS VIEW, IF AI WERE TO BE TREATED AS A RESEARCHER TO PUBLISH THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY, IT WOULD BE USEFUL TO EXPLAIN HOW THE MATERIAL EVIDENCE WAS OBTAINED AND TO INDICATE WHO HAD FOLLOWED IT. MATHEMATICIANS NEED TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS WHEN REPORTING ON RESULTS, AND AI SHOULD ALSO DISCLOSE THE CORRESPONDING THINKING CHAIN AND NOT REFUSE IT SIMPLY TO PREVENT DISTILLATION。
From a business relationship point of view, Deng asks how the contribution of the users should be recognized: after mathematicians pay to use the tools, input into research ideas, and model providers use them to train products and publish results. He argued that it was for the user to choose whether to allow input data to participate in training。
AT THE SAME TIME, HE STRESSED THAT MATHEMATICIANS SHOULD NOT REFUSE TO USE AI, BUT RATHER USE IT AS A TOOL TO ADVANCE RESEARCH, WITH PEOPLE ASKING QUESTIONS AND TAKING DIRECTION. HIS PROPOSALS INCLUDED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RETROACTIVE MECHANISM OF THINKING AND CONTRIBUTION, SO THAT THE OUTCOME COULD INDICATE WHO HAD INITIATED AN IDEA。