THE EMPLOYEE WAS DISMISSED FROM THE AI SUPPORT OFFICE AND THE COMPANY WAS AWARDED 46,000

ON 7 NOVEMBER, ACCORDING TO INFORMATION RECEIVED, MS. WU WAS REPORTED TO BE IN THE LEGAL SERVICE OF AN INSURANCE COMPANY AND, IN JULY 2024, IN ORDER TO OPTIMIZE WORK PROCESSES AND IMPROVE PPT PRODUCTION AND DATA ANALYSIS EFFICIENCY, SHE WAS ABLE TO ORGANIZE SELF-PROCESSED CORPORATE AUDIT DATA SHEETS AND UPLOAD THEM TO A THIRD-PARTY AI PLATFORM THAT HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY RECOMMENDED BY THE HEAD AND IMMEDIATE HEAD OF THE CORPORATE SECTOR FOR USE IN SUPPORT OF THE OFFICE. ONE MONTH LATER, SHE WAS DISMISSED BY THE COMPANY FOR “SERIOUS BREACHES OF RELEVANT PROVISIONS SUCH AS INFORMATION SECURITY”. MS. WU APPLIED FOR ARBITRATION BEFORE THE LABOUR PERSONNEL ARBITRATION COMMISSION OF THE ZHONGYANG DISTRICT OF BEIJING, WHERE THE COURT FOUND THAT MS. WU ' S LACK OF SUBJECTIVE INTENT TO DISCLOSE THE COMPANY ' S SECRETS WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO CONCLUDE THAT HER SERIOUS BREACH OF WORK DISCIPLINE SHOULD RESULT IN THE DISSOLUTION OF THE LABOUR RELATIONSHIP. FINALLY, THE COURT RULED THAT THE NOTICE OF DISMISSAL GIVEN BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO MS. WU SHOULD BE REVOKED, AND THAT THE LABOUR CONTRACT SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE PERFORMED, AND THAT THE VARIOUS PAYMENTS MADE TO MS. WU FOR THE LOSS OF HER SALARY AND FOR THE END-OF-YEAR AWARDS AMOUNT TO OVER $46,000. THE INSURANCE COMPANY APPEALED AGAINST THE FIRST-INSTANCE JUDGEMENT AND THE SECOND-INSTANCE COURT DISMISSED THE APPEAL AND UPHELD THE JUDGEMENT, WHICH IS NOW IN FORCE. ♪ LOOK AT THE MONEY ♪