Wikipedia

On October 29, according to The Verge, part of the online encyclopaedia "Grokipedia" that XAI has just launched was referred to as a direct copy of Wikipedia. The Grokipedia page design is similar to the Wikipedia height, with the search bar at the centre of the first page, with headings, subheadings and references. However, unlike Wikipedia's open editing mechanism, Grokipedia is not currently open for free editing to users, only displays the " Edit" button on some pages and, after clicking, can only view completed changes and cannot submit new..

(August 26, 2012) - TechSpot published a blog post yesterday (August 25) reporting that Wikipedia, with its emphasis on accuracy and human reliability, has explicitly banned the uploading of AI-generated articles. The platform's editors have even compiled a list of "signs of AI writing" to help identify potential AI output, which covers multiple dimensions such as tone, structure, formatting, and citation. In terms of tone, AI articles often exaggerate the importance of their subject matter, repeatedly using words like "important" and "historic" in an overly dramatic way. 1AI cites...

August 6, 2011 - According to 404 Media 5, Wikipedia's editors have just adopted a new policy to combat the flood of AI-generated entries flooding the platform. The new policy gives administrators the authority to quickly delete AI-generated articles if certain conditions are met. Ilyas Lebleu, a founding member of WikiProject AI Cleanup, said, "While certain signs can help us recognize AI content (e.g., wording, use of dashes, list of items with bolded titles, etc.),...

Generating news articles within seconds is certainly a very tempting deployment solution for the media industry, but the technology media CNET did not win applause after taking the lead in implementing it, but instead damaged its reputation. Wikipedia has a page called "Reliable Sources / Perennial Sources" that lists credible and reliable news sources. CNET began using AI to generate some articles in 2022, but because there were a lot of grammatical errors and serious plagiarism in the articles, it was widely criticized.