April 10th news, latest day, yesPublic AccountUsers reflect that back-office articles have been deleted in bulk, suggesting that they are judged by the Platform to be “the existence of a non-realist automated creation”. Opens a link to an article that is “unable to view due to irregularities” and is subject to complaint by the user and review by the platform, and that is not automated。
THE USER INDICATED THAT IT WAS ACCOMPANIED BY A THIRD-PARTY LAYOUT TOOL, WHICH WAS PURELY HANDWRITTEN AND IMPORTED WITH A COMPANION. SOME USERS HAVE DELETED ARTICLES BECAUSE THEY WRITE AN AI WRITING TUTORIAL。
Sina Weibo technology search found that:WeChatThe “unreal automated creative behaviour” rule has recently been updated by the Public Code. It says:PUBLIC NUMBERS AND SERVICE NUMBERS SHALL NOT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE PROCESS OF CONTENT CREATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. BY AI, SCRIPTS, INTERFACES OR OTHER AUTOMATED MEANS.
This includes but is not limited to:
- (a) The act of generating, rewriting, spelling or moving content, using, inter alia, artificial intelligence, away from the expression of the real creator
- (b) The practice of mass, continuous publication of content through automation, such as scripts, programme hosting, etc.
- (b) The dissemination of non-realist automating curricula, methods or services。
With regard to the rules of treatment, the letter indicated that “in the case of violations of the above-mentioned norms, the Platform will apply, depending on the extent of the violation, measures such as traffic restrictions, deletions, etc., and measures such as capacity restrictions, closures, etc. to account numbers”