Youtube There's a kind of financial channel that's so cheap that "students can paint." There are no real people, no special effects, a cartoonist who starts talking about the stock and goes back。
But it's a video about SpaceX, a month 1.6 millionPlay; talk about the credit wave, send it 11 days 600,000.
It's not a number of luck. I've had this very simple for two yearsMatchmanThe main number of the course is organized as the following reference table:
Mack Only about a month to save 4.3 million + to play; to use monkeys for economics Primate Economics30 million, on average 1.2 million。
Split by YouTube ads (thousands of times more than $3): a multimillion to million video, single 300 to 3,000 dollarsThe whole channel is estimated to be in the range of tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars。
It smells good? But don't rush. I'll tear it down for you。
Let's start with cold water: How do we figure this out
I went to check the revenue data so that you wouldn't be crippled:
ONE, 1 TP4T3 THIS NUMBER, SEE WHICH TRACK YOU MAKE。 It's also a simplistic painting, and it's worth a few times. RPM, pure entertainment, funny, animated
There is generally only US$ 1.5-3.5; the high-value commercial content of the financial, commercial and investment categories above, the RPM can reach US$ 8-25. In other words, the first one to talk about SpaceX, the credit number, the single profit is probably higher than "3 dollars a thousand" --That's exactly what it chose.
Second, so don't be brainless, do content with information density。 Not to say that entertainment is not bad, but the same amount of play, and the financial/cop type of advertising that sells money to those willing to pay, the proceeds are not a quantitative level at all. And that's why I'm going to say "research" in the back stream。
And third, the number is set up only for long video + European and American audiences + normal ads。 Shorts has a thousand short video returns of only 0.01 to 0.1, and millions of short video shows are worth a dozen to dozens, so don't take long video accounts to short video sets。
Fourth, the new number has to go beyond the threshold。 YouTube takes 1,000 fans + 4000 hours to open an ad for you. So it was pure input, so don't expect the first video to be profitable。
Fifthly, those figures are the approximation of public statistics。 PLAY, FANS WILL CHANGE OVER TIME, AND THE BENEFITS ARE ESTIMATED BY RPM REGION (THE SUBJECT MATTER, THE AREA, THE AUDIENCE STRUCTURE, AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM), WHICH TELLS YOU “HOW MUCH THIS TRACK CAN RUN”, NOT WHAT A NUMBER ACTUALLY EARNS. DON'T TAKE IT AS A PROMISE。
On the basis of the above five articles, the following work streams make sense。
Why does the Match Man blow
The fireman's lethality is not painting, but..It's forcing you to explain the information.
Without real people, without gorgeous images, the only reason the audience stays is because what you say is useful, interesting and smooth. The simpler the picture, the higher the quality of content。You don't have to paint, perform, shoot, you just have to say something worth hearing。
But don't be fooled by simple. I took a lap to find out that these look roughThe script behind it often takes a lot of time to researchI don't know. The door is never in the instrument, in the content itself。
Full workflow: four steps to make a video
Step one: find three-to-fives of the same direction, unload it with "article style"
Select a direction in which you are genuinely interested and can continue to export (a strong recommendation for knowledge/industry, for the reasons given above)。
Then we find the headmaster in this direction, pick out three-to-five complete videos, rip off their scripts, download the video scripts to refer to Github, the teacher's share:
FOR RELEVANT SCRIPTS, AI CAN ANALYSE AND REFER TOStyle Dismantling: How does it start with people? How? How? What's the oral rhythm
The output of this step is a set of style templates. Here is a summary of the video that I refer to:
Step 2: Real research, articles -- this is the most important step, don't be lazy
This is the whole processIt's worth the most and it's easier to be jumpedOne step。
A LOT OF PEOPLE COME UP WITH THINGS THAT JUST LET AI PRODUCE THE FULL TEXT. I DON'T RECOMMEND IT FOR TWO REASONS:ONE IS THAT YOU DIDN'T LEARN ANYTHING, THE OTHER IS THAT AI CHEWED SECONDHAND, AND USERS DON'T REALLY LIKE IT。
The right thing to do is to study. For example, if you're going to be a pro, you're going to be honestIndustry research, business information, public dataThis is a time-cycle, logic, and key nodes of the industry。
Remember:The contents of the moat was built at this stage, and the tools were only the latter porters。
Step 3: Makeup of the article in the first step style
Researched articles tend to be dry, hard and unsure. This is when the style template that was removed from the first step is put on and optimized。
This way out of somethingIt's both a dry farm and a user's reading preference.
Step four: articles, videos, four moves
Here's the whole chain:
- Articles → Video script → Generation of pictures/audio synthesis
In which the article generates video scripts + spectrophotos, I use: Codexand made a skillIn Chinese and EnglishI don't know. Whether it's a minute short video, or 10 minutes long video, or hundreds of lenses, with your personal cartoon image, it works well。
There's a key operation here, remember: don't let it make all the spectroscopy in one shot。 Let's do a few reference charts, and then you look wrong, and then you turn it into the style you like, and then you make the rest in bulk. If not, hundreds of maps will have to be returned to work。
Voice: Resolve "Open Kneel" with Eleven Labs
You know, YouTube and TikTok, the most repulsive thing is that you can't speak English, and you drive the audience away。
I used it ElevenLabs11 Labs. It produces a natural, emotional voice, and it's just as good as a matchmaker。
And there's a hidden point..The audio has to be done first, then the video。 The rhythm and air-replacement stops first, and then the spectroscopy is stuck to the sound and the breathing point is cut. The video is "respiratory" and the audience will not notice it. The other way around is to come up with a picture and then stick to the sound, and cut it up, and the audience can feel that kind of "mixed sense" and just go。
Scripts, spectrographs, phonograms were synthesized, and a matchmaker video was released. The previous period may have been slow, but after a smooth flow of work, the capacity to move up is visible。
To emphasize again the core of this set of things because it is not like most of the "money lessons":
It's not the matchmaker who makes the money. It's what you've been researching。 It's a tool that can be used by anyone. It's a tool that you can't stop。