Message from October 15th, former byte beat internTani Ko-woofor the first time, in the interview " elsewhere elsewhere " , a more complete account was given of the training of the interference model. as the programme was made public, former team members issued long-form rebuttals, presenting another set of statements about motivation, duration and scope of influence。
THE INTERVIEW TEXT WAS RELEASED ON OCTOBER 12TH, THE PRODUCER NOTES, AND THE INTERVIEW WAS RECORDED IN JULY THIS YEAR. ACCORDING TO TAN KOYU, AT THE TIME, AN INTERN TOOK TOO MUCH CREDIT AND STOPPED ANOTHER PERSON ' S ASSIGNMENT, BUT FAILED TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK TO THE PERSON IN CHARGE, AND LEFT THE GPT WRITING PROCESS TO STOP OR JAM THE OTHER PERSON ' S TRAINING ASSIGNMENT MANUALLY FOR ABOUT 10 DAYS ABOUT FIVE TIMES. HE ADMITTED TO VIOLATING CORPORATE RULES AND WASTING CORPORATE RESOURCES, BUT DENIED THE CLAIMS THAT TRAINING CLUSTERS WERE BEING ATTACKED AND OTHERS WERE BEING TARGETED。
According to the interface news and the vermin report, the ex-colleague ' s publicly available notes suggest that this self-statement is not consistent with the anomalies of the current year ' s project and technical records, and remind investors and those who have knowledge of cooperation. The material also makes allegations about the authenticity of model demonstrations. These statements by Tan Koyu and his former colleagues were conflicting statements by the parties; during the interviews, he indicated that the relevant civil case was still in second instance。