Infringement

August 21 news, recently, Beijing Internet Court concluded a case of personality right infringement involving AI "deep forging" celebrity voices to bring goods, the court finally ruled that the merchant apologized and compensated for the loss. The court ruled that the AI synthesized voice with recognizability can fall into the scope of protection of the rights and interests of the right holder's voice, without the permission of the right holder's use constitutes an infringement of the rights and interests of the right holder, the merchant entrusted the platform "da Ren" to promote goods for the purpose of releasing the video of the goods to obtain the corresponding revenue, did not exhaust the reasonable review of the duty of care, the entrusted person should produce, The merchant entrusted the platform "da ren" to publish the video for the purpose of promoting the goods and obtaining the corresponding income. 1AI Home Attached...

March 2 news, according to CCTV news reports, a few days ago, Wuhan, Hubei Province, the first case of "AI generated map was infringed" copyright disputes in the first instance. In May last year, Wang Mou used AI software to generate a picture and released it to social platforms. However, the following month, Wang realized that the image appeared in an advertisement for an AI painting training camp of a technology company. Wang argued that the company had infringed on his rights and sued it in court. In the end, the court found that the image in question was an original expression and should be protected by copyright law. In the first instance, Wuhan Technology Company was ordered to compensate Wang for the economic loss and reasonable expenses of RMB 4,000. ...

Wuhan East Lake New Technology Development Zone People's Court public number on February 6, informed that recently, a "AI generated map was infringed" copyright dispute case judgment clear, under certain conditions AIGC generated content can be protected by copyright, for the judgment of AIGC generated content copyrightability provides an important reference, but also clearly defined the AIGC It also clearly defines the infringement behavior in the field of AIGC. This is also the first case in which AI image creators in Wuhan have defended their rights. 1AI organized the case information as follows: Plaintiff Wang Mou is a creator of AIGC (Artificial Intelligence Generated Content). 2024 May 17, Wang Mou in the small red...

Recently, the Mita AI search team received a 28-page infringement notice from China Academic Journal (CD-ROM Edition) Electronic Magazine Co., Ltd. (CNKI). The notice pointed out that Mita AI search provided users with a large number of titles and abstracts of CNKI academic documents through its platform without obtaining CNKI's permission. This behavior is considered to have seriously infringed the legitimate rights and interests of CNKI. At the same time, CNKI required Mita Technology to disconnect all links from search results to the CNKI website, and stated that if business cooperation is required, it should contact CNKI. Mita responded to this matter, saying that according to academic norms, the abstracts and titles of documents should be…

As artificial intelligence technology develops rapidly, how to ensure that the works of content creators are not used illegally has become a focus of global attention. A bipartisan group of members of the U.S. Senate recently proposed a new bill, the COPIED Act, which aims to simplify the verification and detection of content generated by artificial intelligence and protect the works of journalists and artists from being used by unauthorized AI models. Source note: The picture is generated by AI, and the picture is authorized by Midjourney. The COPIED Act, the "Content Origin Protection and Deep Fake Media Integrity Act", requires the U.S. National Standards and Technology Research Institute to...