November 7th, according to Xinhua Tech, Professor of Zoology and neuroscientist Matthew Cobb, University of Manchester, United KingdomMatthew Cobb) In a previous interview, it was stated that none had been seen to date AI System outputs are truly creative。
He stressed that the human brain and computer were by their very nature two completely different systems, one a billion-year-old biological product and the other an artificial structure designed in just a few decades。
COBB NOTED THAT AI COULD INDEED PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN DATA PROCESSING, PARTICULARLY IN HELPING TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL PATTERNS IN NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH。
BUT HE BELIEVES THAT AI IS NOT A MODEL FOR HUMAN BRAIN INTERPRETATION, MUCH LESS A SUBSTITUTE FOR HUMAN CREATIVITY。THE REASON FOR THIS IS THAT AI IS CREATED ON THE BASIS OF EXISTING DATA AND MODEL IDENTIFICATION, WHILE HUMAN BEINGS CAN IMAGINE THINGS THAT NEVER EXISTED。
WHEN IT COMES TO SOCIAL APPLICATIONS, COBB REMINDS THAT THE EFFICIENCY GAINS OF AI ARE MAINLY REFLECTED IN THE PREPARATION OF MANUALS, MEDICAL VIDEO-ASSISTED SCREENING, ETC., BUT THAT THEY LACK THE ABILITY TO UNDERSTAND AND SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO FINAL JUDGEMENT。
At the same time, he stressed that many human work values were not only intellectualPosts such as nursing, sanitation, baggage handling, etc., are difficult to replace with machines in the short term.
Cobb put it bluntly that in the future, even if robots showed patience and stability in their care, he would like to be assisted by human caregivers, because the emotional connection between people cannot be replaced by machines. He noted that this was not only a technical issue but also a social and political challenge。