On April 1st, according to the news, the National Intellectual Property Agency issued a risk alert today (1 April) stating that it is not the first time that the National Intellectual Property Authority (INPR) has been involved in this processOpenClaw waitAgentThe exposure of tools to the default security configuration is fragile and can give rise to serious security risks, and the use of such smart bodies to write patent applications can also trigger multiple risks。
1AI LEARNED FROM THE REPORTS THAT THE USE OF SUCH INTELLIGENT BODIES TO WRITE PATENT APPLICATIONS MAY LEAD TO THE FOLLOWING RISKS:
-
“Technology information leak” risk: intelligent bodies such as OpenClaw existOverauthorization, security breach, plug-in poisoningIt's easy to use it to write applicationsThe core information leaks from the technology reportI don't know. In the event of disclosure, the patent application technology programme may be unauthorised by loss of novelty, or even pre-opposed to patent, causing significant losses to the applicant, and the agency is also liable for breach of contract。
-
Risk of “substantive defects”: when using this type of smart body to write an application"AI HALLUCINATING"This resulted in the application documents being denied protection because of problems such as a logical contradiction of content and unclear presentation of technical characteristics。
-
“Unfaithful application” risk: a patent application is made through the creation of an intelligent body in a vacuum, a random fabrication, a collage of content, etcUnfaithful patenting contrary to the principles of good faithI don't know. A certain number of applicants will faceAdministrative penalties such as warnings, finesThe agency and the agent will face administrative penalties such as the revocation of the licence to practise and the cancellation of the agent ' s qualification, and in serious cases will be placed on the list of serious breaches of the law。
To protect against risk and to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of all parties, the National Intellectual Property Institute (INIP) advises:Applicants need to be risk-preventive, carefully selected for compliance with patent agency services, and proactively understand and confirm whether the agency is using a smart body to write the application。If it is found that the agents have used the relevant instruments without permission to cause a leak of information or to constitute an application for bad faith, they can, in accordance with the law, file a complaint and request compensation for damages from the agents。
Patent agencies and their agents must be extremely vigilant about the risks of the use of smart bodies, eliminate the use of smart bodies for fraudulent patent applications and effectively safeguard the legitimate interests of their clients。