Investing time to learn AI tools, the most afraid of choosing the wrong direction. In the face of Midjourney v7, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Instant Dream AI 3.0, and Kerin AI 2.0, the five majorImage GenerationHow to avoid stepping on pits and spend your money (or time) on the knife edge? In this article, we analyze the unique advantages, potential shortcomings and core application scenarios of the five mainstream tools, to help you clear the fog and pinpoint the "magic wand" that can truly ignite your creative inspiration, bid farewell to ineffective attempts to make AI really work for you.
Midjourney
https://www.1ai.net/10463.html
CORE POSITIONING: An independent research lab dedicated to exploring new mediums of thought and expanding the human imagination, transforming written descriptions into artistic visual creations through AI technology.
dominance
1. The overall effect of the map is good: Midjourney is currently the overall effect of the bestAI painting toolsThe performance is excellent in terms of scene atmosphere, character stability and industrial product texture.
2. Strong cue word compliance: through the Midjourney cue word rule description, you can control the map relatively accurately.
3. High ease of use: cue word out of the form of the map, compared with the traditional design tools Photoshop, 3ds Max, etc. learning costs have been significantly reduced!
4. Secondary editing: you can make simple changes to the picture by combining the cue word with the smudge or lasso tool
insufficient
1. Language: the prompts usually need to use English, which is not very friendly to users with a weak foundation in English.
2. High cost: compared to domestic AI painting tools, the cost is high
3. API: Midjourney's Terms of Service do not allow any form of automation and therefore do not provide API calls.
Usage scenarios
Graphic design, UI design, industrial design, self-media and other pursuit of high-quality out of the scene, suitable for professional design needs of users
Dream AI
https://www.1ai.net/10005.html
Core positioning: provide easy-to-use text-to-image and video generation tools, emphasizing cinematic visual quality, precise typography (especially in English) and multimodal creation capabilities, aiming to lower the threshold of creation and empower the fields of digital art and commercial marketing.
dominance
1. Chinese cue word friendly: as the biggest advantage of domestic AI tools is through the Chinese cue word natural language out of the map
2. Good character and style consistency: A small amount of "card draw" can obtain excellent character and style consistency pictures, and the latest "style code" function can stably output the formulated style pictures.
3. Text accuracy: text almost no need to "draw cards" to generate images containing the correct text (currently the strongest of all AI graphic tools)
4. Amazing effect of the national style: the understanding of the Chinese style is very, whether it is a Chinese painting or Chinese style atmosphere sense of the scene have excellent performance
5. High ease of use: easy to operate almost zero threshold, but also through the community of excellent works "to do the same", significantly reducing the cost of learning!
6. Secondary editing: almost covers the main image modification functions, further reducing the design threshold
7. Low cost: Compared to Midjourney, Dream AI provides more space for payment options, and also provides daily bonus points, so newbies can feel free to try it out!
8.API: provide API calls, flexible access to their own programs, and friendly with COZE linkage
insufficient
1. Stability: complex scenes still need to "draw cards", and multiple modifications are prone to deformation of objects
2. Aesthetic: the first time out of the map aesthetic compared to Midjourney is a little weaker
Usage scenarios
Graphic design, UI design, industrial design, self-media and other pursuit of high-quality out of the scene, as well as the aesthetic requirements of the scene is not too high
KeLing AI
https://www.1ai.net/12558.html
Core positioning: aims to lower the threshold of video creation, empower individual creators and enterprise users, and promote the popularization of AI-generated content (AIGC). Provide efficient and low-cost video generation tools to stimulate users' creative expression. It can empower enterprises through API services to optimize the production efficiency of advertisements, e-commerce, short plays and other content.
dominance
1. The overall effect of the map is good: the overall effect of the domestic AI painting tools, whether it is the atmosphere of the scene, the stability of the characters or the texture of industrial products have excellent performance.
2. Strong cue compliance: good understanding of the content of complex cues
3. Ease of use: Functional use of good design, in line with the habits of Chinese people to improve the efficiency of designers and other users
4. Secondary editing: You can make simple changes to the image by combining the cue word with the smudge or lasso tool
insufficient
1. Text generation: When you need to add text in the generated image, regardless of the English and Chinese, the performance is generally very poor
2. High cost: Compared with other AI painting tools in China, the cost is high.
Usage scenarios
Graphic design, UI design, industrial design, self-publishing media and other scenarios pursuing high-quality graphics
Gemini
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Image Generation) Experimental has a powerful image generation and modification capabilities, although not yet reached the full commercial standards, but the daily office, life scenes, design knocking fully satisfied, and free to use in Google's AI Studio, convenient and fast.
dominance
1. Strong semantic understanding and friendly natural language commands
2. Fast speed, under normal network conditions, the map can be completed in about 5 seconds
3. Free Unlimited
insufficient
1. Stability of image modification is a little bit weaker than GPT-4o.
2. Slightly weaker accuracy of generated text
Usage scenarios
Design ideas, quick drawings, daily office work, etc.
GPT-4o
https://www.1ai.net/10491.html
At the core of GPT-4o is the ability to understand that you can give constant feedback to make your own requests and maintain image consistency over successive revisions up to 95%. but on a one-time raw image alone, aesthetically and in detail, it is largely usable, but still not as good as Midjourney.
dominance
1. The stylization effect is excellent
2. Great texture and atmosphere, second only to Midjourney.
3. Strong picture modification stability
4. Stronger stability of text generation
insufficient
1. The speed of generating pictures is slow, and there is a limit for free users
2. There are certain requirements for the quality of cue words
Usage scenarios
Design ideas, product material changes, daily office work, and users who have upgraded to plus.
Comparison of core results
Midjourney:The strongest ability and stable play, a variety of detail processing and texture are the strongest AI painting tools, but the current support for Chinese cue words The effect is poorer, suitable for professional design scenarios, the learning cost is higher. (Charge)
GPT-4o:Excellent stylization, great texture and atmosphere, second only to Midjourney (for a fee)
Gemini:Fast map speed, semantic comprehension, map effect can be done to design creativity, to meet the basic commercial effect (free and unlimited)
I.e. Dream AI:Chinese prompts are friendly, "national style" effect is excellent, (Chinese) text accuracy is super high, community support is excellent, learning cost is low, but map control in complex scenes is poor (fee)
Korin AI:Benchmarking i.e. Dream AI, the effect of national style is stunning, but the text generation ability is weak (regardless of Chinese and English, the probability of error is high) (charge)